The
difference between a US professor or MIT idiot and a top European philosopher
is huge. They are two different humans.
Let's
explain it on the basis of a professor I know and my person.
US
Professor: He may only speak and write American English, this is simplifying
his capacity in thinking.
Delavy:
Can write and talk in German, French, English. This is a school of thinking,
like the difference of German, French and English or Anglo-saxon philosophy.
US
Professor: He accepts his Status quo in his meant world, of USA, of economics
and daily life. What is - must be normal.
Delavy:
Never he accepted any reality as was meant to be by idiots. The world is
complex, but can be explained in a few words.
US
Professor: He knows a lot about details to what he is accumstomed to understand,
be it history, religion or physics and likes to write about those matters - in his
narrow sense - but nothing about reality.
Delavy:
He knows little about details, but all about what really happened in the world
in all times. Whatever happened in the past, at present, in the future in geopolitics,
technics, ecology, mass developments and catastrophes are so clear, he does not
need to think about too much on reasons
and the guilty ones.
US
Professor: He knows a lot about what happens around him and what he learnt in
his profession and about what he reads. The rest is on the level of ordinary
idiots - it stays in the dark.
Delavy:
Knows exactly to the last detail how function huge conglomerates, all banks,
insurance companies, the finance industry, international taxes, the climate
collapse and the real reasons therefore and the true background of geopolitics.
US
Professor: He accepts any religion or philosophy or theory in economics and
just wishes a better behaviour of humans on the globe.
Delavy:
He knows that there is no God, all religions are a crime, philosophies und
science a bluff of nothing, all inventions done to destroy our planet, literature
a story of nothing and our reality something people, even geniuses, will never
understand.
US
Professor: He wants only get what are facts at his university, at congresses,
in his field, about his town and USA - and in fact he misinterprets all what
happens, due to low intellect.
Delavy:
Basic thinking and fundamental knowledge about the origins and effects of any
system, theory on economics, the true impact of great figures, highest
accounting, errors in reasoning of highly respected VIPs of all times and the
long distance effects of inventions and innovations, he can predict what will
happen in the next 100 years - with great exactitude.
US
Professor: When he learns of Trump, he accepts his being and even when becoming
US President, he would just wait and see and wake up after some time - only
basing on what happens in reality.
Delavy:
It is so for any VIP: When I first heard about Trump, I knew he is a crazy
character, a crook and a swine and somehow I "knew" he could become
future US President, basing on stupidity of US folks and media. Nothing can
surprise me, I know ALL about Trump and any VIP.
US
Professor: He leaves aside any theory or complex book, not being on his level
of thinking. It's none of his business.
Delavy:
I wrote 200 critics on all "important heads" of the past and the
present and had not to change one single phrase. Sure, idiots may find things
not being very precise, but in basics, those idiots cannot even guess what he
or she is reading.
US
Professor: He accepts women and Jews as equal und would never accept any
anti-feminism or anti-semitism.
Delavy:
He knew from the start, that women have not the possibility to think on highest
level in abstractedness and therefore, all they write about systems is
worthless. And the Jews have created the atom bomb und neoliberalism and
possess 50 percent of stolen finance fortunes of the globe. They have in fact
destroyed the future of humanity, almost alone.
...and
so it goes on and on and on - and not one person gets what he or she are
reading here....
René
Delavy - Berlin and Bournemouth
written
in October 2017
